User talk:AndrewNeo/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The third-party templates look like [http://www.esrb.org/esrbratings.asp ESRB ratings]. For example, if you put the X one on a page, people will think that the reason the mod was canceled was because it was obscene. And the circle-slash thing would probably exacerbate the effect. Unfortunately, I don't have anything ''constructive'' to add. —'''[[User:Maven|Maven]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Maven|talk]])</sup> 14:36, 27 Oct 2005 (PDT) | The third-party templates look like [http://www.esrb.org/esrbratings.asp ESRB ratings]. For example, if you put the X one on a page, people will think that the reason the mod was canceled was because it was obscene. And the circle-slash thing would probably exacerbate the effect. Unfortunately, I don't have anything ''constructive'' to add. —'''[[User:Maven|Maven]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Maven|talk]])</sup> 14:36, 27 Oct 2005 (PDT) | ||
* Hah, you're right. Well, they're just concept, I probably won't use them. I do like the last one though, at least in general, having a link for a mod to the Valve storefront. We should put that in for all mods that are in there, to see Valve's 'review' of it. --[[User:AndrewNeo|AndrewNeo]] 14:44, 27 Oct 2005 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:44, 27 October 2005
The third-party templates look like ESRB ratings. For example, if you put the X one on a page, people will think that the reason the mod was canceled was because it was obscene. And the circle-slash thing would probably exacerbate the effect. Unfortunately, I don't have anything constructive to add. —Maven (talk) 14:36, 27 Oct 2005 (PDT)
- Hah, you're right. Well, they're just concept, I probably won't use them. I do like the last one though, at least in general, having a link for a mod to the Valve storefront. We should put that in for all mods that are in there, to see Valve's 'review' of it. --AndrewNeo 14:44, 27 Oct 2005 (PDT)