User talk:Solokiller: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Solokiller (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Why did you remove the <nowiki>'''</nowiki> "bold" modifiers anyway? What's up with that? --[[User:Etset|Etset]] 07:01, 22 Feb 2008 (PST) | Why did you remove the <nowiki>'''</nowiki> "bold" modifiers anyway? What's up with that? --[[User:Etset|Etset]] 07:01, 22 Feb 2008 (PST) | ||
:If they are in that section, why didn't you mention it in the summary? It's quite confusing if you remove what appears to be important. I'll look on the rest of the page before adding such content again next time. [[User:Solokiller|Solokiller]] 09:41, 22 Feb 2008 (PST) | :If they are in that section, why didn't you mention it in the summary? It's quite confusing if you remove what appears to be important. I'll look on the rest of the page before adding such content again next time. [[User:Solokiller|Solokiller]] 09:41, 22 Feb 2008 (PST) | ||
::Didn't cross my mind that it might be relevant to include it in the summary because I had checked the rest of the page to see if they already existed. Of course I wasn't just going to delete an (apparently important, but not quite so) piece of information, without making sure there was something else to replace it in any way ... now I feel ... underrated :( | |||
::You're free to change it to whatever you intend. Cheers. --[[User:Etset|Etset]] 15:14, 22 Feb 2008 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 16:14, 22 February 2008
Archives
Steam application IDs
Yes, they are important, that's why they are already listed on the Developer Files section, but they are not games, hence the removal from the Source Engine Games section, reverting to the version prior to Skidz edits.
Why did you remove the ''' "bold" modifiers anyway? What's up with that? --Etset 07:01, 22 Feb 2008 (PST)
- If they are in that section, why didn't you mention it in the summary? It's quite confusing if you remove what appears to be important. I'll look on the rest of the page before adding such content again next time. Solokiller 09:41, 22 Feb 2008 (PST)
- Didn't cross my mind that it might be relevant to include it in the summary because I had checked the rest of the page to see if they already existed. Of course I wasn't just going to delete an (apparently important, but not quite so) piece of information, without making sure there was something else to replace it in any way ... now I feel ... underrated :(
- You're free to change it to whatever you intend. Cheers. --Etset 15:14, 22 Feb 2008 (PST)