Talk:Microsoft Visual Studio 6.0 Usage: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Edited with compliance to current support status: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think that this should not be deleted because people that have MVS 6.0 wont know what to do. For example, if one person trys to make the dlls for their mod, and get follow the instructions listed, hes gunna be in trouble. if we are to delete this topic, we should at least put the contents on the "compiling under VS2002" page.--[[User:Portalgod|Portalgod]] 15:13, 15 Oct 2008 (PDT) | I think that this should not be deleted because people that have MVS 6.0 wont know what to do. For example, if one person trys to make the dlls for their mod, and get follow the instructions listed, hes gunna be in trouble. if we are to delete this topic, we should at least put the contents on the "compiling under VS2002" page.--[[User:Portalgod|Portalgod]] 15:13, 15 Oct 2008 (PDT) | ||
== Edited with compliance to current support status == | |||
I have edited the article to make it comply to the current support status. [[User:Okw1003|Okw1003]] 14:34, 23 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:34, 23 March 2010
It's not quite that simple. If you create a "source code only" mod, the tools linked here will work just fine, but if you choose one of the "Modify" options, the prjconverter creates VC++ 6 project files that are lousy with variables that VC6 cannot understand (and thus that will not compile), and which must be manually replaced with their correct values. —MightyMooquack 18:28, 11 Jul 2005 (PDT)
I think that this should not be deleted because people that have MVS 6.0 wont know what to do. For example, if one person trys to make the dlls for their mod, and get follow the instructions listed, hes gunna be in trouble. if we are to delete this topic, we should at least put the contents on the "compiling under VS2002" page.--Portalgod 15:13, 15 Oct 2008 (PDT)
Edited with compliance to current support status
I have edited the article to make it comply to the current support status. Okw1003 14:34, 23 March 2010 (UTC)