Talk:Microsoft Visual Studio 6.0 Usage: Difference between revisions
(Issue with VC6 compilation) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It's not <em>quite</em> that simple. If you create a "source code only" mod, the tools linked here will work just fine, but if you choose one of the "Modify" options, the <tt>prjconverter</tt> creates VC++ 6 project files that are lousy with variables that VC6 cannot understand (and thus that will not compile), and which must be manually replaced with their correct values. —[[User:MightyMooquack|MightyMooquack]] 18:28, 11 Jul 2005 (PDT) | It's not <em>quite</em> that simple. If you create a "source code only" mod, the tools linked here will work just fine, but if you choose one of the "Modify" options, the <tt>prjconverter</tt> creates VC++ 6 project files that are lousy with variables that VC6 cannot understand (and thus that will not compile), and which must be manually replaced with their correct values. —[[User:MightyMooquack|MightyMooquack]] 18:28, 11 Jul 2005 (PDT) | ||
I think that this should not be deleted because people that have MVS 6.0 wont know what to do. For example, if one person trys to make the dlls for their mod, and get follow the instructions listed, hes gunna be in trouble. if we are to delete this topic, we should at least put the contents on the "compiling under VS2002" page.--[[User:Portalgod|Portalgod]] 15:13, 15 Oct 2008 (PDT) |
Revision as of 15:13, 15 October 2008
It's not quite that simple. If you create a "source code only" mod, the tools linked here will work just fine, but if you choose one of the "Modify" options, the prjconverter creates VC++ 6 project files that are lousy with variables that VC6 cannot understand (and thus that will not compile), and which must be manually replaced with their correct values. —MightyMooquack 18:28, 11 Jul 2005 (PDT)
I think that this should not be deleted because people that have MVS 6.0 wont know what to do. For example, if one person trys to make the dlls for their mod, and get follow the instructions listed, hes gunna be in trouble. if we are to delete this topic, we should at least put the contents on the "compiling under VS2002" page.--Portalgod 15:13, 15 Oct 2008 (PDT)