Talk:Prop data: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TomEdwards (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Please could someone explain ?--[[User:Beeswax|Beeswax]] 08:11, 30 Mar 2008 (PDT) | Please could someone explain ?--[[User:Beeswax|Beeswax]] 08:11, 30 Mar 2008 (PDT) | ||
:Hmm, that's a good question. While both of them theoretically determine physics simulation, I think you'll find that prop_data provides models with additional and overriding information. Why not experiment? --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 02:50, 31 Mar 2008 (PDT) | :Hmm, that's a good question. While both of them theoretically determine physics simulation, I think you'll find that prop_data provides models with additional and overriding information. Why not experiment? --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 02:50, 31 Mar 2008 (PDT) | ||
: I figured it out by reading the propdata.txt when I wasn't so tired ;) The warning DON'T USE THIS FOR A PROP. USE THE NON.BASE ONES. applies only to the base base class.BASE, eg Metal, as opp the NON.BASE ones such Metal.Small, Metal.Large, etc. --[[User:Beeswax|Beeswax]] 08:56, 1 Apr 2008 (PDT) | |||
: As far as I can see, prop_data is used almost exclusively for prop_physics models' special attributes, whereas $surfaceprop is used for anything and everything. As far as I can see, prop_data will not override $surfaceprop or vice versa because the don't seem to define the object properties.--[[User:Beeswax|Beeswax]] 08:56, 1 Apr 2008 (PDT) | |||
== Article Structure & layout == | |||
Please do not edit or delete what you do not understand. Use the discussion page instead. --[[User:Beeswax|Beeswax]] 08:56, 1 Apr 2008 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 08:56, 1 April 2008
QC: $keyvalues prop_data vs $surfaceprop
I'm a bit confused about when to use $surfaceprop QC command rather than the $keyvalue{prop_data ... QC command.
My propdata.txt includes the warning " // DON'T USE THIS FOR A PROP. USE THE NON.BASE ONES. " for each and every base class ...
Please could someone explain ?--Beeswax 08:11, 30 Mar 2008 (PDT)
- Hmm, that's a good question. While both of them theoretically determine physics simulation, I think you'll find that prop_data provides models with additional and overriding information. Why not experiment? --TomEdwards 02:50, 31 Mar 2008 (PDT)
- I figured it out by reading the propdata.txt when I wasn't so tired ;) The warning DON'T USE THIS FOR A PROP. USE THE NON.BASE ONES. applies only to the base base class.BASE, eg Metal, as opp the NON.BASE ones such Metal.Small, Metal.Large, etc. --Beeswax 08:56, 1 Apr 2008 (PDT)
- As far as I can see, prop_data is used almost exclusively for prop_physics models' special attributes, whereas $surfaceprop is used for anything and everything. As far as I can see, prop_data will not override $surfaceprop or vice versa because the don't seem to define the object properties.--Beeswax 08:56, 1 Apr 2008 (PDT)
Article Structure & layout
Please do not edit or delete what you do not understand. Use the discussion page instead. --Beeswax 08:56, 1 Apr 2008 (PDT)