Talk:Optimizing and Checking Your Map: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (avoided disambiguation page & reply) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Could use merging with [[Optimization]] and it's two sub-articles. I hesitate to overhaul this page because it's official Valve stuff, but I think that the other pages have more detailed information. [[User:Maven|Maven]] 07:51, 13 Sep 2005 (PDT) | Could use merging with [[Optimization (level design)|Optimization]] and it's two sub-articles. I hesitate to overhaul this page because it's official Valve stuff, but I think that the other pages have more detailed information. [[User:Maven|Maven]] 07:51, 13 Sep 2005 (PDT) | ||
I think there should be two optimization pages- one technical, one theory. But, like Maven, I'm hesitant to do the splitting. --[[User:Charron|Charron]] 18:13, 4 Jan 2006 (PST) | I think there should be two optimization pages- one technical, one theory. But, like Maven, I'm hesitant to do the splitting. --[[User:Charron|Charron]] 18:13, 4 Jan 2006 (PST) | ||
:Two years and a third later (haha), we definitely have '''loads''' of optimization material! It's obvious that it should be organized... | |||
:I believe that even though this was originally "Valve material", they certainly wouldn't mind if we moved information around, especially if done in a correct way, to achieve a much better end result. --[[User:Etset|Etset]] 14:57, 31 Jan 2008 (PST) |
Latest revision as of 15:57, 31 January 2008
Could use merging with Optimization and it's two sub-articles. I hesitate to overhaul this page because it's official Valve stuff, but I think that the other pages have more detailed information. Maven 07:51, 13 Sep 2005 (PDT)
I think there should be two optimization pages- one technical, one theory. But, like Maven, I'm hesitant to do the splitting. --Charron 18:13, 4 Jan 2006 (PST)
- Two years and a third later (haha), we definitely have loads of optimization material! It's obvious that it should be organized...
- I believe that even though this was originally "Valve material", they certainly wouldn't mind if we moved information around, especially if done in a correct way, to achieve a much better end result. --Etset 14:57, 31 Jan 2008 (PST)