Talk:Using Vice without Steam: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can anyone verify that this works? For me it messes up in the decyption and or encryption stage and if I | Can anyone verify that this works? For me it messes up in the decyption and or encryption stage and if I encrypt one of my txt's and decrypt it again I end up with a txt file thats half encrypted.--[[User:Red comet|Red Comet]] 00:02, 4 Feb 2006 (PST) | ||
I'd rather have this article not be categorized but instead be a branch of the VICE article & still be an [[:Category:Tools|official tool]].—'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' 09:53, 29 Jan 2006 (PST) | I'd rather have this article not be categorized but instead be a branch of the VICE article & still be an [[:Category:Tools|official tool]].—'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' 09:53, 29 Jan 2006 (PST) | ||
I wouldn't consider it an official tool myself, but I do agree that the categories aren't really needed if it is referenced from the Vice page. | I wouldn't consider it an official tool myself, but I do agree that the categories aren't really needed if it is referenced from the Vice page. | ||
Revision as of 01:03, 4 February 2006
Can anyone verify that this works? For me it messes up in the decyption and or encryption stage and if I encrypt one of my txt's and decrypt it again I end up with a txt file thats half encrypted.--Red Comet 00:02, 4 Feb 2006 (PST)
I'd rather have this article not be categorized but instead be a branch of the VICE article & still be an official tool.—ts2do 09:53, 29 Jan 2006 (PST)
I wouldn't consider it an official tool myself, but I do agree that the categories aren't really needed if it is referenced from the Vice page.