Talk:Bounce (level design): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hmm, I think I made a mistake with the diagram. One of the most important aspects of a bounce is the backtracking - and the diagram doesn't communicate the backtracking portion very well. Instead, it suggests two seperate routes. Oops. --'''[[User:Campaignjunkie|Campaignjunkie]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Campaignjunkie|talk]])</sup> 10:43, 24 Dec 2005 (PST) | Hmm, I think I made a mistake with the diagram. One of the most important aspects of a bounce is the backtracking - and the diagram doesn't communicate the backtracking portion very well. Instead, it suggests two seperate routes. Oops. --'''[[User:Campaignjunkie|Campaignjunkie]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Campaignjunkie|talk]])</sup> 10:43, 24 Dec 2005 (PST) | ||
: Bah, ignore above message. I think I've fixed it. Kind of. --'''[[User:Campaignjunkie|Campaignjunkie]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Campaignjunkie|talk]])</sup> 10:58, 24 Dec 2005 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 11:58, 24 December 2005
Hmm, I think I made a mistake with the diagram. One of the most important aspects of a bounce is the backtracking - and the diagram doesn't communicate the backtracking portion very well. Instead, it suggests two seperate routes. Oops. --Campaignjunkie (talk) 10:43, 24 Dec 2005 (PST)
- Bah, ignore above message. I think I've fixed it. Kind of. --Campaignjunkie (talk) 10:58, 24 Dec 2005 (PST)