Valve Developer Community:Avoid peacock terms: Difference between revisions

From Valve Developer Community
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (remove irrelevant examples)
Line 14: Line 14:
* "indisputable..."
* "indisputable..."


These terms do not help establish the importance of an article.  Let the facts speak for themselves. If the {{wiki|ice hockey}} player, [[Wikipedia:Canton (subnational entity)|canton]], or species of {{wiki|beetle}} is worth the reader's time, it will come out in the facts. Insisting on its importance clutters the writing and adds nothing.
These terms do not help establish the importance of an article.  Let the facts speak for themselves.
 
== Examples ==
 
Consider the following two examples. Which do you think makes for more interesting reading?
 
:'''''William Peckenridge,''''' ''eighth '''Duke of Omnium''' ({{wiki|1642}}? - {{wiki|May 8}}, {{wiki|1691}}) is considered, by some people, to be the most important man ever to carry that title.''
 
:'''''William Peckenridge,''''' ''eighth '''Duke of Omnium''' ({{wiki|1642}}? - {{wiki|May 8}}, {{wiki|1691}}) was personal counselor to [[Wikipedia:James I|King James I]], general in the {{wiki|Wars of the Roses}}, a {{wiki|chemist}}, {{wiki|bandleader}}, and the director of the secret society known as {{wiki|The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen}}. He expanded the title of Omnium to include protectorship of Guiana and right of revocation for civil-service appointments in {{wiki|India}}.''
 
The first example simply ''tells'' the reader that William Peckenridge was important. The second example ''shows'' the reader that he was important. [[Wikipedia:WP:Verify|Show]]; don't [[Wikipedia:WP:NOR|tell]].


== Inappropriate subjects ==
== Inappropriate subjects ==

Revision as of 17:16, 14 March 2011

Shortcut
VDC:APT
This article is a modified version of the article available on Wikipedia [1]

In articles, try to avoid Peacock Terms that merely show off the subject of the article without imparting real information.

Some terms to watch for:

  • "an important..."
  • "one of the most important..."
  • "one of the best..."
  • "the most influential..."
  • "a significant..."
  • "intriguingly..."
  • "indisputable..."

These terms do not help establish the importance of an article. Let the facts speak for themselves.

Inappropriate subjects

On the converse side, if you are trying to dress up something that doesn't belong in the VDC—your band, your Web site, your company's product—think twice about it. The VDC is not an advertising medium or home page service. Developers are pretty clever, and if an article is really just personal gratification or blatant advertising, it's not going to last long—no matter how "important" you say the subject is.


See also