Talk:Abstract Mapping: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I believe skies are less abstract than other components...but if you want to have that article taht shows how to make the 6 images...that'd be good—'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ts2do|talk]])</sup> 21:06, 25 Oct 2005 (PDT) | I believe skies are less abstract than other components...but if you want to have that article taht shows how to make the 6 images...that'd be good—'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ts2do|talk]])</sup> 21:06, 25 Oct 2005 (PDT) | ||
Also...consider adding a very specific abstract mapping thing that shows how the parent hierarchy system can be utilized would be nice—'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ts2do|talk]])</sup> 21:07, 25 Oct 2005 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 21:07, 25 October 2005
What else should go here? What kinds of things do people new to Source mapping want to make but don't know the right names?
- Skies: basically link to the 2D skybox and 3D skybox articles, and maybe mention the Terragen article
- Special effects: catch-all for lasers, explosions, etc
- Sound and music
I believe skies are less abstract than other components...but if you want to have that article taht shows how to make the 6 images...that'd be good—ts2do (talk) 21:06, 25 Oct 2005 (PDT)
Also...consider adding a very specific abstract mapping thing that shows how the parent hierarchy system can be utilized would be nice—ts2do (talk) 21:07, 25 Oct 2005 (PDT)