Talk:Func water analog: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Still don't see why....it is a normal water material—'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ts2do|talk]])</sup> 18:52, 16 Oct 2005 (PDT) | Still don't see why....it is a normal water material—'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ts2do|talk]])</sup> 18:52, 16 Oct 2005 (PDT) | ||
:You're very probably right. (That forum link was only pointing out the original source, by the way.) In the future I'll try to be more careful about this sort of thing. —'''[[User:Maven|Maven]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Maven|talk]])</sup> 19:01, 16 Oct 2005 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:01, 16 October 2005
I'm curious - why exactly does it have to be used with the nature/water_movingplane material? I know Valve used it that way, and I certainly use it that way, but not the rationale for it. Performance reasons? Does it simply look better? Would it crash the game, otherwise? --Campaignjunkie (talk) 15:57, 16 Oct 2005 (PDT)
- I just checked the source files for it...it seems there is no real reason under it—ts2do (talk) 16:40, 16 Oct 2005 (PDT)
- That comes from here. I assumed that wisemx knew what he was talking about. I'll ask whether he knows what it's about. —Maven (talk) 18:30, 16 Oct 2005 (PDT)
Still don't see why....it is a normal water material—ts2do (talk) 18:52, 16 Oct 2005 (PDT)