Talk:Func water analog: Difference between revisions

From Valve Developer Community
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


:I just checked the source files for it...it seems there is no real reason under it&mdash;'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ts2do|talk]])</sup> 16:40, 16 Oct 2005 (PDT)
:I just checked the source files for it...it seems there is no real reason under it&mdash;'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ts2do|talk]])</sup> 16:40, 16 Oct 2005 (PDT)
:That comes from [http://www.akilling.org/akg/tutorials/wiseUseableValveWorks.asp here]. I assumed that wisemx knew what he was talking about. I'll ask whether he knows what it's about. &mdash;'''[[User:Maven|Maven]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Maven|talk]])</sup> 18:30, 16 Oct 2005 (PDT)

Revision as of 18:30, 16 October 2005

I'm curious - why exactly does it have to be used with the nature/water_movingplane material? I know Valve used it that way, and I certainly use it that way, but not the rationale for it. Performance reasons? Does it simply look better? Would it crash the game, otherwise? --Campaignjunkie (talk) 15:57, 16 Oct 2005 (PDT)

I just checked the source files for it...it seems there is no real reason under it—ts2do (talk) 16:40, 16 Oct 2005 (PDT)
That comes from here. I assumed that wisemx knew what he was talking about. I'll ask whether he knows what it's about. —Maven (talk) 18:30, 16 Oct 2005 (PDT)