Talk:Converting Textures: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (suggestion to merge: my opinion) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Uh, oops already moved it to Goldsource Models. I'll merge this later I guess, since there don't seem to be any objections. --'''[[User:Campaignjunkie|Campaignjunkie]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Campaignjunkie|talk]])</sup> 13:31, 29 Jul 2006 (PDT) | Uh, oops already moved it to Goldsource Models. I'll merge this later I guess, since there don't seem to be any objections. --'''[[User:Campaignjunkie|Campaignjunkie]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Campaignjunkie|talk]])</sup> 13:31, 29 Jul 2006 (PDT) | ||
:What I think could be done is simply to rename (move) the [[Porting_Goldsource_content_to_Source]] page to something like: "Porting Goldsource models to Source", since it refers to models specifically, instead of "content" in general. Apart from models and textures, are there any other files (file formats) that would be eligible for an article such as these two, "Porting Goldsource <something> to Source"? If there are, maybe we could individually create those articles, and pin them all into a Category by the name of "Porting GoldSource '''content''' to Source". | |||
:It's only my opinion in any case :) --[[User:Etset|Etset]] 06:35, 31 Dec 2007 (PST) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:35, 31 December 2007
Uh, oops already moved it to Goldsource Models. I'll merge this later I guess, since there don't seem to be any objections. --Campaignjunkie (talk) 13:31, 29 Jul 2006 (PDT)
- What I think could be done is simply to rename (move) the Porting_Goldsource_content_to_Source page to something like: "Porting Goldsource models to Source", since it refers to models specifically, instead of "content" in general. Apart from models and textures, are there any other files (file formats) that would be eligible for an article such as these two, "Porting Goldsource <something> to Source"? If there are, maybe we could individually create those articles, and pin them all into a Category by the name of "Porting GoldSource content to Source".
- It's only my opinion in any case :) --Etset 06:35, 31 Dec 2007 (PST)