View source for Talk:$staticprop

I think it's worth to point out this $staticprop explanation from VERC:
* You should always use the $staticprop qc option with prop_physics models.
* $staticprop is named similarly to prop_static entities for historical reasons - but the two things are completely separate concepts.
* $staticprop removes all of the bone info for the model and collapses the object to a single coordinate system. You want to do this always (unless you're making an animated prop/character) because it makes the model more efficient for rendering. 
see [http://www.chatbear.com/?P829869 Jay Stelly - #10. Re: prop_physics collision model issues] --[[User:N-neko|n-neko]] 22:03, 19 Nov 2006 (PST)

== Recent Edits==
Tom - I hope you will include the deleted information in another more relevant article? --[[User:Beeswax|Beeswax]] 03:53, 26 Apr 2008 (PDT)
:Read the text carefully - nothing has been removed at all. --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 04:03, 26 Apr 2008 (PDT)
:: Then you'll have no objection to my replacing it? --[[User:Beeswax|Beeswax]] 04:31, 26 Apr 2008 (PDT)
:::Whatever. Just more for people to read. The only thing I'm going to change is the pigeon-holing of models with it into the prop_ entities. --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 04:34, 26 Apr 2008 (PDT)
:::: Giving people things to read is the purpose of documentation. --[[User:Beeswax|Beeswax]] 05:02, 26 Apr 2008 (PDT)
:::::Let me rephrase: "More stuff for people to read before they gain the same understanding as before". I can't be bothered to fight it right now. --[[user:TomEdwards|TomEdwards]] 09:17, 26 Apr 2008 (PDT)