Difference between revisions of "Talk:Valve Time"

From Valve Developer Community
Jump to: navigation, search
(Rudeness)
(What games are with what dates?)
Line 42: Line 42:
 
To be able to verify the dates, could we have some sort of discreet column explaining what game the delay concerns, possibly on the talk page? Otherwise, people will be able to make all sorts of claims. --[[User:Andreasen|Andreasen]] 05:10, 22 Sep 2007 (PDT)
 
To be able to verify the dates, could we have some sort of discreet column explaining what game the delay concerns, possibly on the talk page? Otherwise, people will be able to make all sorts of claims. --[[User:Andreasen|Andreasen]] 05:10, 22 Sep 2007 (PDT)
 
:I think that some, if not most of them are just random stuff which aren't related directly to a specific game, but just trie to capture the general idea, I don't see any reason to change it, aslong as everyone gets that this is good fun and nothing more.--[[User:RP|RP]] 11:46, 22 Sep 2007 (PDT)
 
:I think that some, if not most of them are just random stuff which aren't related directly to a specific game, but just trie to capture the general idea, I don't see any reason to change it, aslong as everyone gets that this is good fun and nothing more.--[[User:RP|RP]] 11:46, 22 Sep 2007 (PDT)
 +
::The good fun comes from the list consisting of actual citations. There's nothing funny about just calling them slow if there is no support for it. This list can get long enough without making stuff up. --[[User:Andreasen|Andreasen]] 11:50, 12 Feb 2008 (PST)
  
 
== Cleanup and references ==
 
== Cleanup and references ==

Revision as of 19:50, 12 February 2008

Shouldn't this be edited now that the beta of TF2 has been released? --Lons0r 16:16, 18 Sep 2007 (PDT)

Just a light-hearted jab at our favorite developer. We <3 U, Valve. Really.

Still, what does it do at the VDC? --dutchmega 14:33, 1 Jun 2006 (PDT)

Don't worry about it..—ts2do 16:00, 1 Jun 2006 (PDT)

I think that as long as it's good clean fun and not a piss take it's ok--RP 16:06, 3 Jun 2006 (PDT)

Lol Gabe just edited the page..--Gameexpertmaster 15:10, 26 Jul 2006 (PDT)

"Rapture"? noob cannon lol 15:32, 26 Jul 2006 (PDT)
Wikipedia:Rapture see wikipedia. Pretty much it's something that happens right around the end of the world :)- RodeoClown 15:39, 26 Jul 2006 (PDT)
Woo! now this page is official =p—ts2do 16:03, 26 Jul 2006 (PDT)
I think all VALVe staff have a bit of a laugh, sometimes—DogGunn 05:17, 4 Aug 2006 (PDT)
  • Great, Gabe probably posted this as a memo for all employees to use as reference! --AndrewNeo 09:25, 14 Aug 2006 (PDT)

At least "When it's done" isn't 2999... I'm curious, "Tomorrow : At 10:00 Pacific", does that mean 10:00 PM Tomorrow or 10:00 PM Today or what? --Kateye 21:40, 5 Oct 2006 (PDT)

  • "Holiday Season" - I think it should be something like "The time between Christmas to Thanksgiving"--RP
No, see, that's normal Marketingese. Valve said Ep2 would be out during the "Holiday Season", but has since revised that to "Easter Holiday Season". That's why Valve-Time's "Holiday Season" is "Next Year"--Kateye 18:51, 19 Oct 2006 (PDT)

CHEAP HUMOR ISNT FUNNY AND SHOULD BE REMOVED!

I agree. you guys are ruining the page--Lons0r 07:28, 6 Oct 2007 (PDT)

I recently found out that you fail at editing talk pages.--Baliame 17:40, 6 Oct 2007 (CET)
Ouch!--Gear 10:20, 6 Oct 2007 (PDT)

Old entries

can someone please remove these two new entries:

  • September 17th -> April Fools Day!
valve released tf2 - what do you want? there's nothing funny about 17th of sep.
  • In the next Hour or Two. -> See September 17th.
tf2 was released within an hour after valve posted "in the next hour or two" - nothing funny.

SIzzLeopard 02:55, 18 Sep 2007 (PDT)

Imho, a days delay isn't really a significant delay. I know how eagerly some people wait for the releases, but in all honesty, these small, small delays happen, and shouldn't be anything to fuss over (unless someone at Valve swore on their mother or something). Relax! --Andreasen 07:05, 18 Sep 2007 (PDT)

What delay? Valve said they release on 17th and they did - 23:30 is still 17th and NOT 18th. and please but in links for other people can laught tooSIzzLeopard 12:29, 19 Sep 2007 (PDT)

A Gag Category?

I'm wondering... I've seen two "gag pages" on this wiki now - Teh hammre and Valve Time, and I'm wondering if we could give them their own gag category, to make them easier to find. --Andreasen 05:35, 20 Oct 2006 (PDT)

What games are with what dates?

To be able to verify the dates, could we have some sort of discreet column explaining what game the delay concerns, possibly on the talk page? Otherwise, people will be able to make all sorts of claims. --Andreasen 05:10, 22 Sep 2007 (PDT)

I think that some, if not most of them are just random stuff which aren't related directly to a specific game, but just trie to capture the general idea, I don't see any reason to change it, aslong as everyone gets that this is good fun and nothing more.--RP 11:46, 22 Sep 2007 (PDT)
The good fun comes from the list consisting of actual citations. There's nothing funny about just calling them slow if there is no support for it. This list can get long enough without making stuff up. --Andreasen 11:50, 12 Feb 2008 (PST)

Cleanup and references

I have made a slight cleanup of the page and added the references to some of the dates. I would be nice if someone added references to the other entries in the article, because I just don't understand them :) --DrKoljan 08:19, 23 Nov 2007 (PST)

However, cleanup is NOT removing half the goddamn page. --Baliame 08:26, 23 Nov 2007 (PST)
Even if half the page is useless and confusing? --DrKoljan 08:29, 23 Nov 2007 (PST)
A gag article is meant to be useless. --Baliame 08:30, 23 Nov 2007 (PST)
The Duke reference fits just right, please don't remove it. --Tourorist 08:31, 23 Nov 2007 (PST)
If something is interesting to read, then it's somewhat useful. However, unreferenced and meaningless statements are not interesting and therefore are useless. The two entries about the release of Episode Two are unnecessary because there is already an entry with the first release date announced and the actual release date. The "Coming Soon" is a bit off-topic IMHO. --DrKoljan 08:43, 23 Nov 2007 (PST)
This page was made to make fun of VALVe's weird release shedule, even Gabe Newell contributed to it. So don't edit it. Solokiller 10:43, 23 Nov 2007 (PST)
It becomes funnier when the info is real and sourced... --DrKoljan 05:05, 24 Nov 2007 (PST)
Isn't Gabe editing the page himself enough of a source? This isn't wikipedia, THIS IS DEV WIKI! lol. Solokiller 06:26, 24 Nov 2007 (PST)
Gabe editing a page doesn't make the page blessed. I know it's not Wikipedia, but having some real info like the release date of Half-Life 2 (2003 -> 2004) instead of confusing bullshit (In the upcoming months -> Never: what is it about) makes the page funny and interesting. Yeah, maybe I'm just missing the point about some of the entries, but I'm sure there are other people who are new to Half-Life and Valve and would like to know why the article is so sarcastic about the Valve time. That's why I added the links to the HL2 and HL2:Ep1 entries. --DrKoljan 01:16, 25 Nov 2007 (PST)
It's not supposed to be used for actual reference, that's why it's so sarcastic. Solokiller 04:38, 25 Nov 2007 (PST)
How about simply leaving this article alone? --Baliame 04:47, 25 Nov 2007 (PST)
Please tell me you're taking the piss. --TomEdwards 14:28, 23 Nov 2007 (PST)

Rudeness

The most recent addition seems rude...Agree? --wisemx 05:30, 29 Dec 2007 (PST)

Yeah, before anybody adds stuff they should put it here for discussion first. Solokiller 05:59, 29 Dec 2007 (PST)
Agreed with Mark and Solokiller. --Jurgen Knops 06:11, 29 Dec 2007 (PST)
Removed. --Memzero 10:21, 29 Dec 2007 (PST)