Talk:Source
Should this be merged with Source Engine? - Fragrag
Originally was vandalized but ^Ben changed the page. - Shens
- Actually, TomEdwards, I've read an interview about how Source got its name. It actually IS GoldSrc modified... According to the interview, anyway.—Pon t3h p0ny >_> (talk) 02:15, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)
- You are thinking of this. --TomEdwards 02:50, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)
- Yes, according to that, ts2do seems to be quite correct. What's the problem? —Maven (talk) 10:28, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)
- It doesn't say Source is based on GoldSrc, just that it follows Valve's naming conventions.
- Ah, my bad. I couldn't remember what the interview was anyway lol.—Pon t3h p0ny >_> (talk) 18:15, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)
- It doesn't say Source is based on GoldSrc, just that it follows Valve's naming conventions.
- Yes, according to that, ts2do seems to be quite correct. What's the problem? —Maven (talk) 10:28, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)
it said goldsource was the codebase and that the code branched to source—ts2do (talk) 13:55, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)
More support being there's cmultiplayrules and cteamplayrules with much of it not being implemented...it'd also make sense to continue adding to an established engine...—ts2do (talk) 13:57, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)
