Difference between revisions of "Talk:Source"

From Valve Developer Community
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 8: Line 8:
 
:::Yes, according to that, ts2do seems to be quite correct. What's the problem? &mdash;'''[[User:Maven|Maven]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Maven|talk]])</sup> 10:28, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)
 
:::Yes, according to that, ts2do seems to be quite correct. What's the problem? &mdash;'''[[User:Maven|Maven]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Maven|talk]])</sup> 10:28, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)
 
::::It doesn't say Source is based on GoldSrc, just that it follows Valve's naming conventions.
 
::::It doesn't say Source is based on GoldSrc, just that it follows Valve's naming conventions.
 
+
:::::Ah, my bad. I couldn't remember what the interview was anyway lol.&mdash;'''[[User:Pon|Pon t3h p0ny >_>]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Pon|talk]])</sup> 18:15, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)
 
it said goldsource was the codebase and that the code branched to source&mdash;'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ts2do|talk]])</sup> 13:55, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)
 
it said goldsource was the codebase and that the code branched to source&mdash;'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ts2do|talk]])</sup> 13:55, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)
  
 
More support being there's cmultiplayrules and cteamplayrules with much of it not being implemented...it'd also make sense to continue adding to an established engine...&mdash;'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ts2do|talk]])</sup> 13:57, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)
 
More support being there's cmultiplayrules and cteamplayrules with much of it not being implemented...it'd also make sense to continue adding to an established engine...&mdash;'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ts2do|talk]])</sup> 13:57, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)

Revision as of 02:15, 3 November 2005

Should this be merged with Source Engine? - Fragrag

Originally was vandalized but ^Ben changed the page. - Shens

Actually, TomEdwards, I've read an interview about how Source got its name. It actually IS GoldSrc modified... According to the interview, anyway.—Pon t3h p0ny >_> (talk) 02:15, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)
You are thinking of this. --TomEdwards 02:50, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)
Yes, according to that, ts2do seems to be quite correct. What's the problem? —Maven (talk) 10:28, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)
It doesn't say Source is based on GoldSrc, just that it follows Valve's naming conventions.
Ah, my bad. I couldn't remember what the interview was anyway lol.—Pon t3h p0ny >_> (talk) 18:15, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)

it said goldsource was the codebase and that the code branched to source—ts2do (talk) 13:55, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)

More support being there's cmultiplayrules and cteamplayrules with much of it not being implemented...it'd also make sense to continue adding to an established engine...—ts2do (talk) 13:57, 2 Nov 2005 (PST)