Difference between revisions of "Talk:Help Desk"

From Valve Developer Community
Jump to: navigation, search
(Archiving/splitting)
(notice update)
 
(51 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{correctpagequery-top|This talk page is for discussion related to the Help Desk itself.  
+
{{correctpagequery-top|This page is no longer used. See [[New Help Desk]]. Sorry for the confusion!}}
If you have a development question, please ask it in the [[Help Desk]] page itself, under [[Help Desk#Pending Questions|Pending Questions]]. Any development questions asked on this page will be moved there.}}
 
  
==Help Desk Discussion==
+
<div style="float:right; margin: 1em; width: 250px; border: none; padding: 0.5em">
 
+
==Archives==
==="Only move your own question"===
+
* [http://developer.valvesoftware.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:Help_Desk&oldid=130145 03:32, 22 January 2010]
 
+
</div>
"Only move your own question" We're going to have a lot of unclosed questions from people who don't check back after asking. I propose that it's OK to move a question to the Answered section if it's sat there for several days. Also, that answered section should be periodically cleaned and added to some sort of FAQ. &mdash;'''[[User:Maven|Maven]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Maven|talk]])</sup> 12:38, 21 Sep 2005 (PDT)
 
* I would suggest keeping unanswered questions that '''can''' be answered there, but if most people assume they can't, then move them. I also suggest instead of an FAQ, move the answered questions and all comments pertaining to that to an archive page. (Ex. [[Help Desk/Archive 2005]]) Then put a link at the top to the subpages so people can see if their question was already answered. --[[User:AndrewNeo|AndrewNeo]] 13:48, 21 Sep 2005 (PDT)
 
:: I think that new visitors will be inhibited by anything called "archive" much more than something (even the same thing) called "FAQ". I agree with your other point, though. &mdash;'''[[User:Maven|Maven]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Maven|talk]])</sup> 15:44, 21 Sep 2005 (PDT)
 
:::Do what you guys think is right, I whipped this together in five minutes before going to work. It's by no means perfect. :P --[[User:Charron|Charron]] 03:26, 22 Sep 2005 (PDT)
 
 
 
Oh yeah&mdash; Yay for a Help Desk! &mdash;'''[[User:Maven|Maven]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Maven|talk]])</sup>
 
 
 
==Archiving/splitting==
 
 
 
How bout a help desk archive category &mdash;[[User:Ts2do|Ts2do]] 06:13, 22 Sep 2005 (PDT)
 
:We need one. [[User:Jupix|Jupix]] 02:00, 1 Apr 2006 (PST)
 
::I think it's time.. This page is getting way to big... -- [[user:dutchmega|dutchmega]]
 
::Got annoyed... So I archived the answered questions... But what about deleting this entire page? I think the chatbear forum is good enough and have more people. --[[User:Dutchmega|dutchmega]] 09:38, 26 May 2006 (PDT)
 
:::As far as I'm aware, the page was created because people were using [[Talk:Main Page]] and other pages in the same manner. Deleting it won't make the questions go away. I think there are probably more intelligent ways of archiving and managing it, though. The content from Answered Questions should be integrated into existing topics and FAQs or deleted. An archive page is only relevant when it's necessary to preserve some chronological aspect, imo, otherwise it has no useful function.
 
:::There also needs to be an update to the "only move your own question" rule. Some folk seem to be using the page in a drive-by manner - post and see if anyone responds, but if they don't then hey, no loss to them. That works fine in a forum setting where those posts will then sink off the forum's front page, but it just makes a mess here. I think any question unserviced for a month should be deleted or moved to answered. --[[User:Giles|Giles]] 12:22, 26 May 2006 (PDT)
 
:::: That is a wonderful Idea. Please do that, it will make things a lot more easier. [[User:Cubedude|Cubedude]] 19:36, 26 May 2006 (PDT)
 

Latest revision as of 15:48, 22 July 2018


Archives