Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dog"

From Valve Developer Community
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
I also think it's a bit rich to ask "Shouldn't this be in with the entity information", and then to just go ahead and copy it across without waiting for any kind of an answer. If I thought it should have gone in with the entity info then I would have put it there to begin with, and disputes are meant to be discussed.--[[User:Graham|Graham]] 18:58, 19 Aug 2005 (PDT)
 
I also think it's a bit rich to ask "Shouldn't this be in with the entity information", and then to just go ahead and copy it across without waiting for any kind of an answer. If I thought it should have gone in with the entity info then I would have put it there to begin with, and disputes are meant to be discussed.--[[User:Graham|Graham]] 18:58, 19 Aug 2005 (PDT)
 +
 +
Why the hell did you turn the Dog page into a redirect to the image for Dog?--[[User:Graham|Graham]] 17:55, 20 Aug 2005 (PDT)

Revision as of 00:55, 21 August 2005

No, the information on Dog shouldn't just be under his entity description, because it's irrelevant to the technical information of using the entity. Also because other characters should have vastly larger pages about them, and to mix it in with the entity information would simply cause problems.

I also think it's a bit rich to ask "Shouldn't this be in with the entity information", and then to just go ahead and copy it across without waiting for any kind of an answer. If I thought it should have gone in with the entity info then I would have put it there to begin with, and disputes are meant to be discussed.--Graham 18:58, 19 Aug 2005 (PDT)

Why the hell did you turn the Dog page into a redirect to the image for Dog?--Graham 17:55, 20 Aug 2005 (PDT)