Difference between revisions of "Talk:Abstract Mapping"

From Valve Developer Community
Jump to: navigation, search
(Ideas for new articles)
Line 25: Line 25:
  
 
how bout <nowiki>[hierarchical || attached || welded]</nowiki> objects&mdash;'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ts2do|talk]])</sup> 14:37, 26 Oct 2005 (PDT)
 
how bout <nowiki>[hierarchical || attached || welded]</nowiki> objects&mdash;'''[[User:Ts2do|ts2do]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ts2do|talk]])</sup> 14:37, 26 Oct 2005 (PDT)
 +
 +
The moving water idea would be appropriate in the [[Water]] article. &mdash;'''[[User:Maven|Maven]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Maven|talk]])</sup> 08:27, 17 Nov 2005 (PST)

Revision as of 16:27, 17 November 2005

Ideas for new articles

What else should go here? What kinds of things do people new to Source mapping want to make but don't know the right names?

  • Physics: people have heard that Source has nifty physics stuff, and this could point them to the entities and articles about it !!INCOMPLETE!!
  • Reflections? Cubemaps, buildcubemaps, maybe on article on reflective shaders, water_lod_control, and mention that HL2 doesn't have any mirrors.
  • Sticking stuff together (aka, "Duct tape, hinges, glue, and string" <grin>): parenting, the physics constraints, and model attachment points
  • Glass: as a hub for the various articles we already have (and be sure to mention how to make normal, unbreakable glass)
  • Doors and windows: prop- and brush-based, area portals, and links to AKG series. We could use a wiki version of the AKG door skin page.
  • Fighting: assaults, battle lines, rappel, dropships, gunships, strider, headcrab cannisters, door kicking, ai_goal_police, combat AI, snipers... wee!
  • Weapons: not just the normal weapon entities, but also the func_tank and friends, and the article on creating usable mounted guns
  • Moving water, tutorial on implementing Func_water_analog smoothly.

Comments

I believe skies are less abstract than other components...but if you want to have that article taht shows how to make the 6 images...that'd be good—ts2do (talk) 21:06, 25 Oct 2005 (PDT)

It might not be abstract, but it would be useful. Like the Water article, it can help people doing mapping as well as people doing materials. —Maven (talk) 21:11, 25 Oct 2005 (PDT)

Also...consider adding a very specific abstract mapping thing that shows how the parent hierarchy system can be utilized would be nice—ts2do (talk) 21:07, 25 Oct 2005 (PDT)

That's an excellent idea. I haven't a clue what to call it, though. —Maven (talk) 21:12, 25 Oct 2005 (PDT)

Well call it what it is...maybe a breakable radar that pivots..."Radar"...something else?—ts2do (talk) 22:37, 25 Oct 2005 (PDT)

this would run into conflicts on devs locating it for use later tho—ts2do (talk) 22:38, 25 Oct 2005 (PDT)

Parenting does all sorts of things, so calling it "radar"-something is making it much more specific rather than more abstract. On the other hand calling it "parenting" defeats the purpose, because then only people who already know what it's called will find it. Maybe something like 'joining two entities', and toss in phys_constraint? —Maven (talk) 08:17, 26 Oct 2005 (PDT)

how bout [hierarchical || attached || welded] objects—ts2do (talk) 14:37, 26 Oct 2005 (PDT)

The moving water idea would be appropriate in the Water article. —Maven (talk) 08:27, 17 Nov 2005 (PST)